2006 年最佳 Open Source CMS

Packt publishing 在去年舉辦了最佳 Open Source 內容管理系統獎,在經過幾輪的票選後,結果在11月公佈,前三名分別是 Joomla!、Drupal、Plone。

Packt Open Source CMS Award

在票選結果的 公佈網頁上 可以看到 Joomla! 與 Drupa 競爭的相當激烈,最後由 Joomla! 勝出。不過網頁上提到,要選出最佳的 CMS 實不容易,因為這幾個 CMS 都各有所長,好或不好端賴使用者的目的。除了參加決選的這三套 CMS外,初選入圍的還有 e107 及 Xoops。這5套 CMS 各自的特色分別如下:

Drupal

  • Has been around for quite some time and is stable and actively developed
  • Well coded and has an available granular permissions system and a strong eye for security
  • Configuration was a breeze
  • Lightweight installation
  • Plethora of modules and themes
  • Exceptional documentation and has an active and friendly community
  • The node concept is very good

e107

  • Easy to setup and install
  • Wide selection of themes and modules
  • Provides lots of flexibility
  • Backend seems well put together
  • Drop down menu is a nice touch and is organized well

Joomla!

  • Very easy to install and use with lots of extensions and modules
  • The documentation is exhaustive and concise
  • Admin user interface is intuitive and powerful
  • The backend of Joomla! is very usable and the WYSIWYG editor the content was nice
  • Seems like it would scale well and provides a lot of customization options
  • Large and active community

Plone

  • Very flexible and powerful
  • Great user interface
  • Very clean default installation
  • Lots of addon modules
  • Worth taking the steep learning curve
  • Impressed with the customization it offers
  • Integration with LDAP or other login systems is a plus

XOOPS

  • Minimalist initial install
  • Great community support
  • Provides lots of addon modules and themes
  • Lots of functionality
  • Mature and has a very good permissions system

最近我們準備要更換圖書館網站的版面,我提出了採用 Open Source 的CMS系統。若真的決定要從傳統網頁轉換為 CMS,這樣子的改變可真不小,所以真的要好好的評估才是。除了上述的資訊可以參考外,自由軟體鑄造場電子報除了在第73 及74 期針對 Joomla! 做了詳細的介紹外(見延申閱讀) ,相信應該也有介紹過其他幾套CMS才對。

延申閱讀:

Open Source CMS: Joomla

[OSSF專欄] 崛起中的 PHP CMS-Joomla!

[OSSF專欄] CMS 優質新秀-Joomla!(

2006 年最佳 Open Source CMS 有 “ 5 則迴響 ”

  1. 我個人對圖書館網頁採用CMS系統的方式表示讚成,這樣在管理與維護上有一制性的介面與相對應的呈現方式;對提供資訊及讀者間的交流、分享上面將大大提升便利性。另外,相關功能的介面都整合進來,讓所有的資訊在一個平台上都可以呈現出來。

  2. 樓上的上面2個也CMS嗎??國內有那家用啊?有沒有中文說明啊!
    1樓的roger對那家有研究?
    2樓的ted你家用那個?(不要跟我說全家),有沒有文章頁獻比較表啊

  3. 我們家還沒正式使用CMS,我是有在測試啦。我評估後選擇Drupal。

    去年美國密西根大學圖書館也選擇了Drupal,他們在部落格上也公開了各CMS的比較表和擇選過程。

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s