世界大學網路排名 2016年第2版出爐

世界大學網路排名網站上看來,他們不再用2016 second edition,而用 Edition 2016.2.0 July 取代,目前還加上 beta 字樣,顯示還是有可能會有小幅度的變動。


世界大學網路排名(台灣)

世界大學網路排名的指標不時會做一些改變,原本機構典藏系統(IR) 主要貢獻在 Openness 這一項,可能在 2017年版本中會改為 Transparency,數據則來自 Google Scholar Citations institutional profiles。之前機構典藏系統 pdf全文檔的貢獻將會於Presence表現出來,但不再限機構典藏系統,而是全校網域網站(含pdf檔)在Goole的索引數據。不論是Openness還是Presence,都只各占10%,影響力相對其他二個指標算是很低。

關於 Transparency 的排名,稍早在該網站就公佈了 Second Edition (July 2016 version 1.1),列出了4,000多個學校的排名,下面是台灣前20名。

世界大學網路排名(Transparency,台灣)

這項排名的 methodology 可以參考網頁上的說明,只是 Google 如何知道文章的作者是那一個學校的呢? 所以世界大學網路排名網站上就有下面這段話:

To set up an personal profile in Google Scholar Citations database is voluntary, but once made it public the responsibility for info correctness belongs to the author. GSC automatically updates the profiles that is very practical but that sometimes adds non-pertinent records and citations to the profile. Authors should be aware of these issues and clean their profiles periodically. Also institutions should monitor their members profiles for intended (or unintended) fake, incorrect or duplicate records. This is key for the ranking as any institution with at least one of these problems can be excluded from future editions of the ranking.

也就是說,未來學校是否要提醒教師去設定或公開他/她的 Google Scholar Citations institutional profiles?

延伸閱讀:
世界大學網路排名 2015年第2版出爐

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s